Transaction

0dd4a2d803c092cc72dce4ecec2cae23cbcd862d2039a4231ceaab4cb6cb2dec
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-25 02:48:48
Fee Paid
0.00000009 BSV
(
0.00341270 BSV
-
0.00341261 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.63 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
95,674
Size Stats
846 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00341261 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMR<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770.msg8637#msg8637">Quote from: satoshi on August 11, 2010, 12:14:22 AM</a></div><div class="quote">It's hard to think of how to apply zero-knowledge-proofs in this case.<br/></div><br/>It's hard for me too! :-) Was interesting to re-read though!<br/><br/>Was hoping it would spawn some insight on a way for nodes to demonstrate that they "always follow" the block generating rules, in absence of everyone needing to have the set of all transactions to double check.<br/><br/>It didn't. :-)<br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/0dd4a2d803c092cc72dce4ecec2cae23cbcd862d2039a4231ceaab4cb6cb2dec