Transaction

j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMp<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg27451#msg27451">Quote from: RHorning on December 06, 2010, 08:02:35 PM</a></div><div class="quote">I would like to propose the following specification for actual name of the domain itself...</div><br/>OK, but not so fast! Is there an existing standard we can be compatible with? It will save us some time, and probably also save us from making some mistakes. I know the existing domain names use a weird encoding system ("punycode") for historic reasons, and I'm not suggesting to replicate that. But working with an existing list of valid unicode characters would make sense.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader">Quote</div><div class="quote">Some possible domain names would be "excluded" from this schema and held in common such as excluding domains named "com", "net", "edu"</div><br/>Hmm, can this work? I had assumed that the DomainChain names would all take some standard suffix so that they can integrate smoothly with the existing domain names. Just like .p2p is being used for the non-decentralized project. Otherwise, what if someone registers (say) foobar and next year InterNIC adds foobar as an official top-level domain?<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader">Quote</div><div class="quote">"Sub-domains" can also be established using a "dot" structure off of a previously established domain name</div>If you have registered a domain name, you automatically get the ability to create whatever subdomains you want. Subdomains are just records in your domain name server, under your control. The registrar doesn't need to know about them.</div> text/html