j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM
<div class="post">Silently failing would look bad.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704.msg7575#msg7575">Quote from: gavinandresen on August 04, 2010, 08:40:55 PM</a></div><div class="quote">1. Rate limit based on the first byte of the IP address (79. or 81. in this case).<br/></div>Definitely needed. What rate are you thinking of? Ultimately, it's better to rate limit it than to let it all drain out.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704.msg7575#msg7575">Quote from: gavinandresen on August 04, 2010, 08:40:55 PM</a></div><div class="quote">3. Rate limit based on last two domains of reverse DNS lookup of the IP address (rima-tde.net in this case).<br/></div>That might work surprisingly well. If it works, it keeps them from hitting the rate limit, but the rate limit is there as the last line of defence. <br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704.msg7575#msg7575">Quote from: gavinandresen on August 04, 2010, 08:40:55 PM</a></div><div class="quote">4. Make the standard amount given away 0.5 Bitcoins (Bitcoins have gone up 10 times in value since I started the Faucet).<br/></div>Definitely time to lower it. <br/></div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/094f0d6521b86337fb104fbfbc139e8a87ac5b90d24700c3a05b09ef1c8a5f7b