Transaction

082e4ecdcfa3b27c32c24f3ea8c28e20cb256dfb4f62362adf231e849fbfb610
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-28 00:56:16
Fee Paid
0.00000016 BSV
(
0.00663360 BSV
-
0.00663344 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.58 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,050
Size Stats
1,512 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00663344 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMì<div class="post">I've managed to set up dependencies and build bitcoin with MS Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition. I'll give 2010 a try at some time.<br/><br/>There is a custom allocator class in serialize.h, secure_allocator, that fails to build with non-debug runtime selected. It is my understanding allocator classes require a template copy constructor, I've attached a small patch that solves the problem.<br/><br/>As Satoshi noted elsewhere, the MSVC build is indeed significantly slower khash/s-wise (more than twice) than the prebuilt one (MinGW?), even though I enabled the highest optimization level options and also global optimization with link-time code generation. I find that result strange, since MSVC is not known to have significantly worse optimizer than GCC's. Most probably the problem can be traced to the sha module that is extracted from Crypto++. I find in Crypto++ SVN there are revised versions of the module, including x86/x64 assembly for SHA-256. Using the newer versions would involve reintegrating their dependencies, though. On that note, why aren't we using OpenSSL's SHA-2 hashing functions instead? Since we already use OpenSSL, this would be a better solution than to manually support a SHA module from another library.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/082e4ecdcfa3b27c32c24f3ea8c28e20cb256dfb4f62362adf231e849fbfb610