j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMM<div class="post">I also wonder if the message has to be taken into account for the hash computation. Not doing so would allow to delete it later.<br/><br/>I very much don't like this idea of a message. Since it is not necessary to the protocol, I'm not sure if it would be easy to find a place where it really fits. I'm not a programmer though. I'd be curious to have Satoshi's thought on this.<br/><br/>Edit. I have a funny idea. Imagine that numeric precision is increased way beyond 8 decimals, say 128 decimals for instance.<br/><br/>What about using those decimals to code your message ? Somehow you would have a "natural fee" for this service, and we won't have to modify anything from the protocol.<br/><br/>Edit #2. Gosh I LOVE this idea <img alt="Smiley" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/smiley.gif"/><br/><br/>Edit #3. We don't need 128 decimals. Correct me if I'm wrong, but with 32 decimals you can code a 17 characters-longed uncompressed message in a 64 characters set. (32*log(10)/log(64) = 7.717)<br/></div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/06ce3cf42d024a0dbd7b5d842ccd2d04da1ab2f4f0f294ba2d7838f36afe1cd8