j"19HxigV4QyBv3tHpQVcUEQyq1pzZVdoAutMy On Monday, August 10, 2020, 11:39:40 AM PDT, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0
<punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 06:33:24 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <[1]jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Breaking Defense: GPS Anti-Jam M-Code Takes Two Steps Forward.
>> [2]https://breakingdefense.com/2020/08/gps-anti-jam-m-code-takes-two
-steps-forward/
> I take it you're cheering the efforts of your technofascist pals
eh Jim? now GPS can't be jammed, GPS surveillance can't be tampered
with. Tecnofascists win!
Yet again, you foolishly come to conclusions with no support at all.
I am not "cheering" anything. I post cites to articles that I think
Cypherpunks would find interesting. This means that I both cite "good
news" and "bad news" issues. (Or, possibly, "news" that is neither
"good" nor "bad".)
Usually, I don't bother to explain my position with respect to that
news, because I'm not generally into "virtue signalling". You seem to
be.
Jim Bell
References
1. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com
2. https://breakingdefense.com/2020/08/gps-anti-jam-m-code-takes-two-steps-forward/
text/plainbinary(ef31b0b71c0020ac27db9707ea2e39162bee14cc
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/005e7e2b63335af243842756ada97c7b845579e69864caa00a26befb35cd4f19